(Reuters) — Google, Alibaba and different “Big Tech” companies may very well be compelled to share knowledge on financial services clients with banks and financial know-how companies to forestall unfair competitors.

As Facebook’s plan for its Libra “stablecoin” faces scrutiny, a world physique of regulators from the world’s essential financial facilities stated that Big Tech’s rising tentacles raised questions for financial stability, competitors and knowledge privateness.

The Financial Stability Board (FSB) known as in a report launched on Sunday for “vigilant monitoring” of Big Tech’s shift into financial services, which it stated might crimp the flexibility of banks to generate capital by means of retained income.

While nonetheless solely “nascent” in most nations, Big Tech in nations like China has introduced financial services inside attain of underserved communities, the FSB, which is chaired by Federal Reserve Governor Randal Quarles, stated within the report.

The FSB stated gamers together with Microsoft, Amazon, eBay, Baidu, Apple, Facebook and Tencent, have huge databases, whereas some provide asset administration, funds and lending.

Many Big Tech companies like Amazon, Facebook, eBay, Alipay and Google have acquired payments-related licenses in European Union nations together with Luxembourg, Ireland and Lithuania, though most haven’t but constructed up any big volumes.

Banks in Europe and elsewhere are already required to share buyer knowledge with third get together “fintech” companies that wish to provide rival funds services, and this may increasingly must be the case with Big Tech too, the FSB stated.

“Big Tech firms’ ability to leverage customer data raises the question of whether – and the degree to which – authorities could consider the potential to promote the mobility of data between the various actors that are involved in the provision of financial services,” the FSB stated.

“Doing so may help encourage competition and help ensure a level playing field amongst market participants.”

Regulators may additionally want to duplicate their strategy to insurers and asset managers by specializing in “activities that have implications for financial stability” somewhat than a spotlight solely on the scale of the agency, the FSB stated.